Tiel (electoral district)
Tiel was an electoral district of the House of Representatives in the Netherlands from 1850 to 1918.
Profile
.jpg)
Tiel was created as a single-member district in 1850 out of parts of the provisional district of Zaltbommel, and a small part of the district of Elst, both of which were abolished. It comprised the far west of the province of Gelderland between the Meuse, Waal and Lek rivers, and was named after the town of Tiel. Throughout its existence, the district's boundaries routinely shifted, including in 1858 and in 1864. In 1869, it was turned into a larger two-seat district, encompassing towns such as Culemborg, Geldermalsen and Zaltbommel. Tiel ceded territory in the 1888 revision, which changed the district to a single-seat district, losing Culemborg again to the district of Wijk bij Duurstede, and Zaltbommel to Druten. It retained these boundaries until the district was abolished in 1918.[1][2][3]
Tiel's population increased slightly from 22,458 in 1850 to 24,571 in 1864. After its 1969 enlargement, the district had a population of 45,954, which continued to grow steadily to 48,331 in 1909, despite losing territory again in 1888. Throughout its existence, a majority of the population of Tiel was aligned with the Dutch Reformed Church, ranging from 63% in 1850 to 83.5% in 1897. Most of the remainder of the population was Roman Catholic, ranging from 12% in 1909 to 34% in 1850.[4]
The district of Tiel was abolished upon the introduction of party-list proportional representation in 1918.
Members



For most of its existence, Tiel was a contested district, electing liberals, conservatives and antirevolutionaries.[3] It was represented by one member between 1850 and 1869, two between 1869 and 1888, and one again from 1888 until its abolition in 1918. Some of its prominent members include former chairman of the Council of Ministers Jacob de Kempenaer (1853–1860), former chairman Theo van Lynden van Sandenburg (1869–1874), Donald Mackay (1871–1877), who would later inherit a Scottish peerage and serve as governor of Bombay, and Gerard Beelaerts van Blokland (1883–1888). After its last boundary revision in 1888, Tiel consistently elected liberals until 1918, most prominently Map Tydeman Jr., who became the district's longest-serving representative, serving from 1891 until 1916.
| Election | First member | Party | Second member | Party | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850 | Edmond Willem van Dam van Isselt | Ind | One seat (1850-1869) | |||
| 1852 | ||||||
| 1852 | Jasper Andreas Adrianus Leemans | Ind | ||||
| 1853 | Jacob de Kempenaer | Ind | ||||
| 1854 | ||||||
| 1858 | ||||||
| 1860 | Willem Frederik Carel van Lidth de Jeude | Ind | ||||
| 1862 | ||||||
| 1866 | ||||||
| 1866 | ||||||
| 1868 | ||||||
| 1869[a] | Johannes Jerphaas Hasselman | Ind | Theo van Lynden van Sandenburg | Ind | ||
| 1871 | Donald Mackay | Ind | ||||
| 1871 | Theo van Lynden van Sandenburg | Ind | ||||
| 1873 | ||||||
| 1874 | Hendrik Anthon van Rappard | Ind | ||||
| 1875 | ||||||
| 1876 | ||||||
| 1877 | Willem Hendrik de Beaufort | Ind | ||||
| 1877 | Herman Jacob Dijckmeester | Ind | ||||
| 1879 | ||||||
| 1881 | ||||||
| 1883 | Gerard Beelaerts van Blokland | AR | ||||
| 1884 | Frederik Willem Jacob van Aylva van Pallandt | AR | ||||
| 1886 | ||||||
| 1887 | ||||||
| 1888 | Herman Jacob Dijckmeester | Lib | One seat (1888-1918) | |||
| 1891 | ||||||
| 1891 | Map Tydeman Jr. | Lib | ||||
| 1894 | ||||||
| 1897 | VL | |||||
| 1901 | ||||||
| 1905 | ||||||
| 1909 | ||||||
| 1913 | ||||||
| 1916 | Hendrik Coenraad Dresselhuys | VL | ||||
| 1917 | ||||||
- ↑ A periodic election and a by-election were held on the same day.
Election results
Elections in the 1850s
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edmond Willem van Dam van Isselt | Independent | 538 | 51.48 | |
| W. R. van Hoëvell | Independent | 470 | 44.98 | |
| Others | 37 | 3.54 | ||
| Total | 1,045 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 1,045 | 98.58 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 15 | 1.42 | ||
| Total votes | 1,060 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,560 | 67.95 | ||
| Independent gain | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[5] Huygens Institute[6] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edmond Willem van Dam van Isselt | Independent | 645 | 83.23 | |
| Guillaume Groen van Prinsterer | Independent | 26 | 3.35 | |
| N.F.C.J. Sassen | Independent | 16 | 2.06 | |
| W. R. van Hoëvell | Independent | 15 | 1.94 | |
| A. Schouten | Independent | 15 | 1.94 | |
| Others | 58 | 7.48 | ||
| Total | 775 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 775 | 99.10 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 7 | 0.90 | ||
| Total votes | 782 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,441 | 54.27 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[7] Huygens Institute[8] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | First round | Second round | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Votes | % | Votes | % | |||
| Jacob de Kempenaer | Independent | 318 | 33.83 | 477 | 43.72 | |
| J.A.A. Leemans | Independent | 277 | 29.47 | 614 | 56.28 | |
| Julius Constantijn Rijk | Independent | 114 | 12.13 | |||
| Daniël Jan Steyn Parvé | Independent | 108 | 11.49 | |||
| P.A. Reuchlin | Independent | 74 | 7.87 | |||
| A.F.H. Hoffmann | Independent | 19 | 2.02 | |||
| J. van den Andel | Independent | 15 | 1.60 | |||
| Others | 15 | 1.60 | ||||
| Total | 940 | 100.00 | 1,091 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 940 | 99.37 | 1,091 | 99.27 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 6 | 0.63 | 8 | 0.73 | ||
| Total votes | 946 | 100.00 | 1,099 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,441 | 65.65 | 1,441 | 76.27 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[7] Huygens Institute[9][10] | ||||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob de Kempenaer | Independent | 721 | 65.72 | |
| J.A.A. Leemans | Independent | 345 | 31.45 | |
| Others | 31 | 2.83 | ||
| Total | 1,097 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 1,097 | 97.42 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 29 | 2.58 | ||
| Total votes | 1,126 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,404 | 80.20 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[11] Huygens Institute[12] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob de Kempenaer | Independent | 662 | 74.80 | |
| Willem Hendrik | Independent | 196 | 22.15 | |
| Others | 27 | 3.05 | ||
| Total | 885 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 885 | 98.33 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 15 | 1.67 | ||
| Total votes | 900 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,404 | 64.10 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[13] Huygens Institute[14] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacob de Kempenaer | Independent | 539 | 57.28 | |
| B. van Merlen | Independent | 318 | 33.79 | |
| P.A. Reuchlin | Independent | 17 | 1.81 | |
| Others | 67 | 7.12 | ||
| Total | 941 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 941 | 99.26 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 7 | 0.74 | ||
| Total votes | 948 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,454 | 65.20 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[15] Huygens Institute[16] | ||||
Elections in the 1860s
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W.F.C. van Lidt de Jeude | Independent | 615 | 65.08 | |
| J.C.F. van Hoytema | Independent | 218 | 23.07 | |
| Jacob van Lennep | Independent | 62 | 6.56 | |
| H. Dijckmeester | Independent | 24 | 2.54 | |
| Others | 26 | 2.75 | ||
| Total | 945 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 945 | 99.68 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 3 | 0.32 | ||
| Total votes | 948 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,598 | 59.32 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[17] Huygens Institute[18] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W.F.C. van Lidt de Jeude | Independent | 539 | 77.89 | |
| J.C.F. van Hoytema | Independent | 130 | 18.79 | |
| Others | 23 | 3.32 | ||
| Total | 692 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 692 | 98.16 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 13 | 1.84 | ||
| Total votes | 705 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,634 | 43.15 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[19] Huygens Institute[20] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W.F.C. van Lidt de Jeude | Independent | 736 | 82.98 | |
| Johannes Jerphaas Hasselman | Independent | 133 | 14.99 | |
| Others | 18 | 2.03 | ||
| Total | 887 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 887 | 99.33 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 6 | 0.67 | ||
| Total votes | 893 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,627 | 54.89 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[21] Huygens Institute[22] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W.F.C. van Lidt de Jeude | Independent | 857 | 72.81 | |
| Ludolph Anne Jan Wilt Sloet van de Beele | Independent | 177 | 15.04 | |
| Johannes Jerphaas Hasselman | Independent | 86 | 7.31 | |
| Others | 57 | 4.84 | ||
| Total | 1,177 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 1,177 | 99.92 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 1 | 0.08 | ||
| Total votes | 1,178 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,627 | 72.40 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[23] Huygens Institute[24] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W.F.C. van Lidt de Jeude | Independent | 691 | 68.08 | |
| A.A. Bleijenberg | Independent | 176 | 17.34 | |
| Ludolph Anne Jan Wilt Sloet van de Beele | Independent | 123 | 12.12 | |
| Others | 25 | 2.46 | ||
| Total | 1,015 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 1,015 | 98.93 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 11 | 1.07 | ||
| Total votes | 1,026 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 1,680 | 61.07 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[25] Huygens Institute[26] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J.J. Hasselman | Independent | 1,055 | 51.06 | |
| Willem Jan Knoop | Independent | 759 | 36.74 | |
| James John Teding van Berkhout | Independent | 119 | 5.76 | |
| Theo van Lynden van Sandenburg | Independent | 75 | 3.63 | |
| Thomas Joannes Stieltjes | Independent | 41 | 1.98 | |
| Others | 17 | 0.82 | ||
| Total | 2,066 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 2,066 | 97.96 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 43 | 2.04 | ||
| Total votes | 2,109 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,840 | 74.26 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[27] Huygens Institute[28] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theo van Lynden van Sandenburg | Independent | 1,052 | 50.99 | |
| Thomas Joannes Stieltjes | Independent | 873 | 42.32 | |
| J.J. Hasselman | Independent | 80 | 3.88 | |
| Willem Jan Knoop | Independent | 32 | 1.55 | |
| Others | 26 | 1.26 | ||
| Total | 2,063 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 2,063 | 97.82 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 46 | 2.18 | ||
| Total votes | 2,109 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,840 | 74.26 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[27] Huygens Institute[29] | ||||
Elections in the 1870s
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Mackay | Independent | 1,121 | 50.27 | |
| Theo van Lynden van Sandenburg | Independent | 1,082 | 48.52 | |
| Others | 27 | 1.21 | ||
| Total | 2,230 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 2,230 | 99.38 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 14 | 0.62 | ||
| Total votes | 2,244 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,910 | 77.11 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[30] Huygens Institute[31] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theo van Lynden van Sandenburg | Independent | 1,210 | 57.45 | |
| Ludolph Anne Jan Wilt Sloet van de Beele | Independent | 896 | 42.55 | |
| Others | ||||
| Total | 2,106 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,910 | – | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[30] Huygens Institute[32] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theo van Lynden van Sandenburg | Independent | 1,331 | 64.99 | |
| L. Mulder | Independent | 625 | 30.52 | |
| Others | 92 | 4.49 | ||
| Total | 2,048 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 2,048 | 98.79 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 25 | 1.21 | ||
| Total votes | 2,073 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,896 | 71.58 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[33] Huygens Institute[34] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | First round | Second round | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Votes | % | Votes | % | |||
| Hendrik Anthon van Rappard | Independent | 820 | 46.25 | 1,238 | 54.78 | |
| Herman Jacob Dijckmeester | Independent | 817 | 46.08 | 1,022 | 45.22 | |
| J. Wolbers | Independent | 124 | 6.99 | |||
| Others | 12 | 0.68 | ||||
| Total | 1,773 | 100.00 | 2,260 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 1,773 | 98.99 | 2,260 | 99.34 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 18 | 1.01 | 15 | 0.66 | ||
| Total votes | 1,791 | 100.00 | 2,275 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,934 | 61.04 | 2,934 | 77.54 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[33] Huygens Institute[35][36] | ||||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Mackay | Independent | 1,350 | 59.76 | |
| Jan Willem Gefken | AR | 893 | 39.53 | |
| Others | 16 | 0.71 | ||
| Total | 2,259 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 2,259 | 99.30 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 16 | 0.70 | ||
| Total votes | 2,275 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,988 | 76.14 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[37] Huygens Institute[38] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hendrik Anthon van Rappard | Independent | 1,056 | 96.26 | |
| Others | 41 | 3.74 | ||
| Total | 1,097 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 1,097 | 90.21 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 119 | 9.79 | ||
| Total votes | 1,216 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,988 | 40.70 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[37] Huygens Institute[39] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willem Hendrik de Beaufort | Independent | 759 | 51.63 | |
| P.A.C.H.T.A. Werdmöller von Elgg | Independent | 586 | 39.86 | |
| Willem van Goltstein | Independent | 85 | 5.78 | |
| Others | 40 | 2.72 | ||
| Total | 1,470 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 1,470 | 98.46 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 23 | 1.54 | ||
| Total votes | 1,493 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,108 | 48.04 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[37] Huygens Institute[40] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herman Jacob Dijckmeester | Independent | 1,001 | 50.66 | |
| Willem van Goltstein | Independent | 604 | 30.57 | |
| Barthold Jacob Lintelo de Geer van Jutphaas | AR | 367 | 18.57 | |
| Others | 4 | 0.20 | ||
| Total | 1,976 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 1,976 | 98.85 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 23 | 1.15 | ||
| Total votes | 1,999 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,164 | 63.18 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[41] Huygens Institute[42] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willem Hendrik de Beaufort | Independent | 983 | 50.26 | |
| Gerard Beelaerts van Blokland | AR | 962 | 49.18 | |
| Others | 11 | 0.56 | ||
| Total | 1,956 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 1,956 | 98.29 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 34 | 1.71 | ||
| Total votes | 1,990 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,104 | 64.11 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[43] Huygens Institute[44] | ||||
Elections in the 1880s
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herman Jacob Dijckmeester | Independent | 1,354 | 51.25 | |
| Gerard Beelaerts van Blokland | AR | 1,274 | 48.22 | |
| Others | 14 | 0.53 | ||
| Total | 2,642 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 2,642 | 99.06 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 25 | 0.94 | ||
| Total votes | 2,667 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,192 | 83.55 | ||
| Independent hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[45] Huygens Institute[46] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerard Beelaerts van Blokland | AR | 1,451 | 54.26 | |
| Willem Hendrik de Beaufort | Independent | 1,223 | 45.74 | |
| Others | ||||
| Total | 2,674 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 2,674 | 99.33 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 18 | 0.67 | ||
| Total votes | 2,692 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,230 | 83.34 | ||
| Anti-revolutionary gain | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[47] Huygens Institute[48] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerard Beelaerts van Blokland | AR | 1,437 | 25.66 | |
| F.W.J. van Aylva baron van Pallandt | AR | 1,429 | 25.51 | |
| Herman Jacob Dijckmeester | Independent | 1,395 | 24.91 | |
| Cornelis Pijnacker Hordijk | Independent | 1,337 | 23.87 | |
| Others | 3 | 0.05 | ||
| Total | 5,601 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 5,601 | 99.13 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 49 | 0.87 | ||
| Total votes | 5,650 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,266 | 172.99 | ||
| Anti-revolutionary hold | ||||
| Anti-Revolutionary gain | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[49] Huygens Institute[50] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerard Beelaerts van Blokland | AR | 1,609 | 25.50 | |
| F.W.J. van Aylva baron van Pallandt | AR | 1,602 | 25.39 | |
| Herman Jacob Dijckmeester | Independent | 1,567 | 24.84 | |
| Pieter Rink | Independent | 1,521 | 24.11 | |
| Others | 10 | 0.16 | ||
| Total | 6,309 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 6,309 | 98.98 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 65 | 1.02 | ||
| Total votes | 6,374 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,401 | 187.42 | ||
| Anti-revolutionary hold | ||||
| Anti-Revolutionary hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[51] Huygens Institute[52] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F.W.J. van Aylva baron van Pallandt | AR | 1,606 | 29.32 | |
| Gerard Beelaerts van Blokland | AR | 1,605 | 29.30 | |
| Pieter Rink | Independent | 1,143 | 20.87 | |
| Map Tydeman Jr. | Independent | 1,104 | 20.15 | |
| Others | 20 | 0.37 | ||
| Total | 5,478 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 5,478 | 98.99 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 56 | 1.01 | ||
| Total votes | 5,534 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,377 | 163.87 | ||
| Anti-Revolutionary hold | ||||
| Anti-revolutionary hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[53] Huygens Institute[54] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herman Jacob Dijckmeester | Lib | 1,416 | 55.59 | |
| Gerard Beelaerts van Blokland | AR | 1,131 | 44.41 | |
| Total | 2,547 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 2,547 | 99.22 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 20 | 0.78 | ||
| Total votes | 2,567 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,874 | 89.32 | ||
| Liberal gain | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[55] Huygens Institute[56] | ||||
Elections in the 1890s
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herman Jacob Dijckmeester | Lib | 1,354 | 58.39 | |
| M. Kolff | C | 565 | 24.36 | |
| G.W. van Rechteren van Appeltern | AR | 377 | 16.26 | |
| Others | 23 | 0.99 | ||
| Total | 2,319 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 2,319 | 98.85 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 27 | 1.15 | ||
| Total votes | 2,346 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,894 | 81.06 | ||
| Liberal hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[57] Huygens Institute[58] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map Tydeman Jr. | Lib | 1,547 | 65.97 | |
| Æneas Mackay Jr. | AR | 798 | 34.03 | |
| Total | 2,345 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 2,345 | 99.83 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 4 | 0.17 | ||
| Total votes | 2,349 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,894 | 81.17 | ||
| Liberal hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[57] Huygens Institute[59][a] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map Tydeman Jr. | Lib | 1,054 | 84.19 | |
| Willem Hendrik de Beaufort (born 1845) | Lib | 143 | 11.42 | |
| Willem Hendrik de Beaufort (born 1844) | Independent | 32 | 2.56 | |
| Others | 23 | 1.84 | ||
| Total | 1,252 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 1,252 | 95.94 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 53 | 4.06 | ||
| Total votes | 1,305 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,879 | 45.33 | ||
| Liberal hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[60] Huygens Institute[61] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map Tydeman Jr. | VL | 3,121 | 64.98 | |
| Frederik van Bylandt | VA | 1,241 | 25.84 | |
| F. Mol | Rad | 441 | 9.18 | |
| Total | 4,803 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 4,803 | 98.26 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 85 | 1.74 | ||
| Total votes | 4,888 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 5,903 | 82.81 | ||
| Free Liberal gain | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[62] Huygens Institute[63] | ||||
Elections in the 1900s
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map Tydeman Jr. | VL | 2,621 | 71.73 | |
| Theo Heemskerk | AR | 1,033 | 28.27 | |
| Total | 3,654 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 3,654 | 94.15 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 227 | 5.85 | ||
| Total votes | 3,881 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 5,639 | 68.82 | ||
| Free Liberal hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[64] Huygens Institute[65] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map Tydeman Jr. | VL | 2,666 | 60.66 | |
| Coenraad van der Voort van Zijp | AR | 1,453 | 33.06 | |
| H.P. de Wilde | VD | 276 | 6.28 | |
| Total | 4,395 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 4,395 | 95.09 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 227 | 4.91 | ||
| Total votes | 4,622 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 5,935 | 77.88 | ||
| Free Liberal hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[66] Huygens Institute[67] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map Tydeman Jr. | VL | 2,634 | 61.95 | |
| H.C. Hogerzeil | AR | 1,305 | 30.69 | |
| J.A. Bergmeyer | SDAP | 313 | 7.36 | |
| Total | 4,252 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 4,252 | 95.23 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 213 | 4.77 | ||
| Total votes | 4,465 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 6,267 | 71.25 | ||
| Free Liberal hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[68] Huygens Institute[69] | ||||
Elections in the 1910s
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map Tydeman Jr. | VL | 3,279 | 56.22 | |
| Chris Smeenk | AR | 1,600 | 27.43 | |
| Louis Hermans | SDAP | 953 | 16.34 | |
| Total | 5,832 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 5,832 | 98.61 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 82 | 1.39 | ||
| Total votes | 5,914 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 6,816 | 86.77 | ||
| Free Liberal hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[70] Huygens Institute[71] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hendrik Coenraad Dresselhuys | VL | 2,800 | 50.68 | |
| Johannes Beelaerts van Blokland | AR | 1,604 | 29.03 | |
| Louis Hermans | SDAP | 1,054 | 19.08 | |
| Anthon Gerrit Æmile van Rappard | VL | 67 | 1.21 | |
| Total | 5,525 | 100.00 | ||
| Valid votes | 5,525 | 98.56 | ||
| Invalid/blank votes | 81 | 1.44 | ||
| Total votes | 5,606 | 100.00 | ||
| Registered voters/turnout | 7,454 | 75.21 | ||
| Free Liberal hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[70] Huygens Institute[72] | ||||
| Candidate | Party | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hendrik Coenraad Dresselhuys | VL | |||
| Total | ||||
| Registered voters/turnout | 7,640 | – | ||
| Free Liberal hold | ||||
| Source: Electoral Council,[73] Huygens Institute[74] | ||||
Notes
- ↑ The procès-verbal states the total number of valid votes as being 2,327, eighteen fewer than the sum of the candidates' votes.
References
- ↑ "Gemeenten per district: Tiel". Huygens Resources (in Dutch). Retrieved 2 May 2026.
- ↑ "opmerkingen_per_district: Tiel". Huygens Resources (in Dutch). Retrieved 2 May 2026.
- 1 2 De Jong, Ron; Van der Kolk, Henk; Voerman, Gerrit (2011). Verkiezingen op de kaart 1848-2010: Tweede Kamerverkiezingen vanuit geografisch perspectief [Elections on the map 1848-2010: House of Representative elections from a geographic perspective] (in Dutch). Utrecht: Uitgeverij Matrijs. ISBN 9789053454374.
- ↑ "Samenstelling per district: Tiel". Huygens Resources (in Dutch). Retrieved 2 May 2026.
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 27 augustus 1850, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (27/08/1850), Huygens Institute
- 1 2 Tweede Kamer 8 juni 1852, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (08/06/1852), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (09/11/1852), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (23/11/1852), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 17 mei 1853, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (17/05/1853), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 13 juni 1854, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (13/06/1854), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 8 juni 1858, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (08/06/1858), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 12 juni 1860, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (12/06/1860), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 10 juni 1862, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (10/06/1862), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 12 juni 1866, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (12/06/1866), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 30 oktober 1866, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (30/10/1866), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 22 januari 1868, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (22/01/1868), Huygens Institute
- 1 2 Tweede Kamer 8 juni 1869, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (08/06/1869), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (08/06/1869), Huygens Institute
- 1 2 Tweede Kamer 13 juni 1871, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (13/06/1871), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (10/10/1871), Huygens Institute
- 1 2 Tweede Kamer 10 juni 1873, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (10/06/1873), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (15/09/1874), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (29/09/1874), Huygens Institute
- 1 2 3 Tweede Kamer 8 juni 1875, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (08/06/1875), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (11/01/1876), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (17/04/1877), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 12 juni 1877, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (12/06/1877), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 10 juni 1879, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (10/06/1879), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 14 juni 1881, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (14/06/1881), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 12 juni 1883, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (12/06/1883), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 28 oktober 1884, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (28/10/1884), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 15 juni 1886, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (15/06/1886), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 1 september 1887, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (01/09/1887), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 6 maart 1888, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (06/03/1888), Huygens Institute
- 1 2 Tweede Kamer 9 juni 1891, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (09/06/1891), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (08/12/1891), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 10 april 1894, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (10/04/1894), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 15 juni 1897, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (15/06/1897), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 14 juni 1901, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (14/06/1901), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 16 juni 1905, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (16/06/1905), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 11 juni 1909, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (11/06/1909), Huygens Institute
- 1 2 Tweede Kamer 17 juni 1913, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (17/06/1913), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (08/12/1916), Huygens Institute
- ↑ Tweede Kamer 15 juni 1917, Electoral Council
- ↑ Verkiezingsuitslag Tiel (15/06/1917), Huygens Institute