Mirza Mumin's assault

Mirza Mumin's assault
Part of the prelude to the Dano-Mughal War

Engraving showing the faujdar of Pipli meeting Arakanese people in 1676
DateLate 1641
Location
Pipli, Mughal Empire (near present-day Kirtania Port, India)
21°33′51″N 87°20′11″E / 21.56417°N 87.33639°E / 21.56417; 87.33639
Result Mughal victory
Territorial
changes		 Danish factory at Pipli is destroyed
Belligerents
 Danish India
Commanders and leaders
Mirza Mumin
Unk. Nawab		 Danish India Poul Nielsen (POW)
Danish India Unk. lower merchant (POW)
Units involved
Great Mughal's troops Danish India Sepoys
Strength
300 men Unknown, but minor
Casualties and losses
Unknown All imprisoned

Mirza Mumin's assault and subsequent destruction of the Danish factory at Pipli in Bengal by Mughal forces occurred in late 1641.

After having problems with collecting debts from a local Persian merchant, the Danes at their factory in Pipli arrested the Persian, taking his slave and goods into custody as he escaped imprisonment. Followingly, the faujdar of Pipli, Mirza Mumin, and the local Mughal Nawab intervened, sending an army of 300 men to the Danish factory. The factory was taken and levelled to the ground, while the Danes were imprisoned and transported to Cuttack, with only some managing to escape.

Background

In 1616, the Danish East India Company was founded,[1][2][3] and after a successful expedition to India in 1620,[4][3][5] it established the colony of Tranquebar.[6] A few years later,[7][8][9] a Danish factory was established at Pipli in Bengal.[10]

After having left the factory in charge of Indian caretakers[11][12][13] in 1626,[11][12] the Danes again took the factory in Pipli into use[14] following a promise from local Mughal merchants[14][15] in c. 1635[15] to give the Danes a firman from the Mughal Emperor, Shah Jahan.[14][15] In c. 1640,[16][3] the Danish factory was led by a chief merchant (overkøbmand),[17][16][3] named Poul Nielsen,[17] with another merchant under him.[17][16][3] In addition to a couple of[17] Danish commoners[16][3] and Indian trade officers,[17][16][3] the Danes had employed a minor force of[17][16][3] Indian[17] soldiers from Tranquebar[17][16][3] to protect against thieves[17][16][3] and outlaws.[18][3]

Prelude

Tariffs and prohibitions

Trade did well during Roland Crappé's tenure as the governor of Tranquebar;[14][19] however, as soon as Danish trade made a surplus,[20][17] the Danes' relation with the faujdar of Pipli,[14] Mirza Mumin,[a] became unfriendly.[14][21] Mumin subsequently made demands[17] and imposed tariffs[14][17][20][3] and prohibitions[14] on the Danes, which favored the Dutch in the city,[14][21] while damaging the Danes.[14][3] According to Danish author Asta Bredsdorff, the demands were unduly high and unfair to the extent that it was impossible to fulfil.[17]

Furthermore, when Bernt Pessart succeeded Crappé, economic difficulties arose, and the Mughals' self-confidence grew as the D.E.I.C.'s reputation declined. Consequently, in 1639, Mirza Mumin even prevented a Danish ship from obtaining cargo there, which Danish colonial historian Kay Larsen claimed seemed to indicate that either the tariffs were unpaid or the Danes' gifts to the local Mughal Nawab were not given sufficiently. Larsen additionally speculated that the factory had similar problems with disorder to those in Tranquebar.[14][b]

Problems with collecting debts

In addition to the economic difficulties,[25] the Danes had problems with collecting debts[14][17][3] from local merchants,[17][3] who were untrustworthy and always sought protection from Mirza Mumin.[20]

Assault

Arresting a Persian

In late 1641,[3] Poul Nielsen[14] could not collect the company's debts[14][3] from a notorious[17] Persian merchant.[25] The merchant refused to pay back his[14][17][25] considerable[25] debt[14][17][25] despite continuous inquiries,[17][25] and when Mirza Mumin would not help, Nielsen[14] took the matter into his own hands:[14][26][3] He ordered[14] a Danish guard in the factory[20][3] to arrest the Persian in his own home.[17][27][3] Nevertheless, the Persian escaped, to whom Nielsen sent armed men into the city to find him.[14][17] When this was unsuccessful,[17] the Danes took one of his female slaves and some of his goods and brought them to the Danish factory in custody.[14][17][27]

Nawab's intervention

However, the Mughal government could not tolerate the Danish vigilantism,[17][27] and, consequently, Mumin[20][3] and the local Nawab[14][21] now intervened militarily[14][20][3][21] and gathered an army of 300 men[28] of the Great Mughal's troops.[14][17] According to Indian historian Lalit Mohan Mitra, this pretext was slim;[21] however, American historian of Southeast Asia, Kathryn Wellen, presumes that the Mughals viewed the Danish acts as a breach of sovereignty.[27]

Assault on the factory

The army now attacked the factory,[29] first besieging it,[21] and thereafter overwhelming it after catching the Danes off guard.[20] Subsequently, the warehouses were plundered,[20] and the factory was levelled to the ground[14][20][21][3] by fire.[17][27] The Danish goods were seized,[14][17][27][3] and the Danes themselves were imprisoned[29] and transported inland[14][20][3] to Cuttack[14] in chains.[17]

Aftermath

Fate of the Danes in Cuttack

In Cuttack, the Danes were severely mistreated.[14] Nonetheless, after some time,[17][27] Poul Nielsen and some others managed to escape[30] by a vessel[20] and reached Tranquebar[27] in the summer[31] of 1642.[32][33]

Casus belli for the Dano-Mughal War

The D.E.I.C. estimated the loss of the factory at 5 barrels (0.79 m3) of gold.[14] As a result, the incident, together with the grounding of St. Jacob, damaged the company's economy[34][20][33] to such an extent that the Danes were now forced to use extreme means.[32][35] Accordingly, in 1642, the governor of Tranquebar, Bernt Pessart, declared war on the Mughal Empire,[32][35][33][21] which was indirectly attributed to Mirza Mumin.[20] A couple of years later, in 1644, the new governor of Tranquebar, Willem Leyel, launched his privateering campaign against the Mughal Empire with compensation from hostile Mughal actions as the primary goal for the campaign.[36] Consequently, Leyel's manifesto justifying the war mentions that the Danes abandoned trade in Bengal as a result of the hostile Mughal actions and the impossibility of receiving compensation.[37]

See also

Notes and citations

Notes

  1. ↑ Kay Larsen also mentioned him as a viceroy.[20]
  2. ↑ In the same period, two Danish priests, Niels Andersen and Christian Pedersen Storm,[22] had caused great disorder in Tranquebar.[23][24]

Citations

  1. ↑ Bredsdorff 1999, pp. 10, 187.
  2. ↑ Wellen 2015, p. 445.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Larsen 1907, p. 434.
  4. ↑ Bredsdorff 1999, pp. 11, 187.
  5. ↑ Mitra 1952, p. 6.
  6. ↑ Bredsdorff 1999, p. 11; Larsen 1935, p. 71; Wellen 2015, p. 446; Larsen 1907, p. 434; Mitra 1952, p. 7.
  7. ↑ Larsen 1908, p. 11.
  8. ↑ Wellen 2015, p. 446.
  9. ↑ Mitra 1952, p. 8.
  10. ↑ Larsen 1908, p. 11; Bredsdorff 1999, p. 13; Larsen 1935, p. 71; Wellen 2015, p. 446; Larsen 1907, p. 434; Mitra 1952, p. 8.
  11. 1 2 Larsen 1908, p. 12.
  12. 1 2 Bredsdorff 1999, p. 21.
  13. ↑ Mitra 1952, p. 9.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Larsen 1908, p. 13.
  15. 1 2 3 Bredsdorff 1999, p. 32.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Larsen 1935, p. 71.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Bredsdorff 1999, p. 81.
  18. ↑ Larsen 1935, pp. 71–72.
  19. ↑ Bredsdorff 1999, p. 33.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Larsen 1935, p. 72.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mitra 1952, p. 10.
  22. ↑ Bredsdorff 1999, pp. 108, 110.
  23. ↑ Bredsdorff 1999, pp. 73, 103, 105, 108–110.
  24. ↑ Wellen 2015, p. 447.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Wellen 2015, p. 453.
  26. ↑ Wellen 2015, pp. 453–454.
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wellen 2015, p. 454.
  28. ↑ Larsen 1908, p. 13; Bredsdorff 1999, p. 81; Larsen 1935, p. 72; Mitra 1952, p. 10; Larsen 1907, p. 434; Wellen 2015, p. 454.
  29. 1 2 Larsen 1908, p. 13; Bredsdorff 1999, p. 81; Larsen 1935, p. 72; Wellen 2015, p. 454; Larsen 1907, p. 434.
  30. ↑ Larsen 1908, p. 14; Bredsdorff 1999, pp. 81–82; Larsen 1935, p. 72; Wellen 2015, p. 454; Larsen 1907, p. 434–435.
  31. ↑ Bredsdorff 1999, p. 82.
  32. 1 2 3 Larsen 1908, p. 14.
  33. 1 2 3 Larsen 1907, p. 435.
  34. ↑ Bredsdorff 1999, pp. 88, 134.
  35. 1 2 Bredsdorff 1999, p. 88.
  36. ↑ Bredsdorff 1999, p. 134.
  37. ↑ Wellen 2015, p. 449.

Works cited

  • Larsen, Kay (1908). De dansk-ostindiske koloniers historie – De Bengalske loger & Nikobarerne [History of the Danish East Indian Colonies – The Bengali Lodges & the Nicobar Islands] (in Danish). Vol. 2. Copenhagen, Denmark: Centralforlaget – via Danskernes Historie Online.
  • Larsen, Kay (1935). Ipsen, Poul (ed.). "En lille dansk Søkrig i Indien" [A Little Danish Naval War] (PDF). Tidsskrift for Søvæsen. 106. Copenhagen, Denmark: Søe-Lieutenant-Selskabet – via Marinehistorisk Selskab.
  • Bredsdorff, Asta (1 January 1999). Willem Leyels liv og farefulde rejse til Indien [The Trials and Travels of Willem Leyel] (PDF). Søhistoriske Skifter. Vol. 21. Copenhagen, Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press. ISBN 87-7289-498-9. ISSN 0107-6647.
  • Wellen, Kathryn (2015). "The Danish East India Company's War against the Mughal Empire, 1642-1698" (PDF). Journal of Early Modern History. 19 (5). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill Publishers: 439–461. doi:10.1163/15700658-12342470. eISSN 1568-5209. ISSN 0022-4995.
  • Mitra, Lalit Mohan (September 1952). The Danes in Bengal (PDF) (1st ed.). Kolkata, India: Prabartak Publishers. p. 15 – via Internet Archive.
  • Larsen, Kay (September 1907). Munch, Peter Rochegune (ed.). "Danske Kapertogter i den bengalske Havbugt" [Danish Privateer Voyages in the Bay of Bengal]. Det ny Aarhunderede. 4. Copenhagen, Denmark: Harvard Library – via Internet Archive.
This page is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.