Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad
| Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Argued April 12–13, 1926 Decided June 7, 1926 | |
| Full case name | Yu Cong Eng, et al. v. Trinidad, Collector, et al. |
| Citations | 271 U.S. 500 (more) 46 S. Ct. 619; 70 L. Ed. 1059; 1926 U.S. LEXIS 642 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Supreme Court of the Philippines |
| Holding | |
| The Chinese Bookkeeping Act violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Philippine Autonomy Act. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Taft, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Philippine Autonomy Act | |
Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad, 271 U.S. 500 (1926), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a law passed by the US colonial government of the Philippines in 1921, Act No. 2972 of the Philippine Legislature, known as the "Chinese Bookkeeping Act", was unconstitutional. It prevented business records from being kept in the Chinese language.
External links
- Text of Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad, 271 U.S. 500 (1926) is available from: Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress
- Excerpts from the text of the Supreme Court decision Archived January 18, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
Categories:
- United States Supreme Court cases in 1926
- Legal history of the Philippines
- Linguistic rights
- United States Supreme Court cases
- United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court
- China–Philippines relations
- Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States
- History of Manila
- 1926 in the Philippines
- China–United States relations
- United States Supreme Court stubs
