Dimensionless physical constant

In physics, a dimensionless physical constant is a physical constant that is dimensionless, i.e. a pure number having no units attached and having a numerical value that is independent of whatever system of units may be used.[1] These dimensionless constants appear in many physics and engineering models.[2]: 1  In fundamental physical models, sets of dimensionless physical constants characterize specific models.

Fundamental constants

Physicists have discussed the nature of the term fundamental physical constant, those physical constants that appear in the most fundamental physics equations. Michael Duff argues that the laws of physics should not depend on the units of measurement: only dimensionless physical constants should be used in these laws.[3] By using the system of natural units where dimensioned physical constants are all set to 1, the laws of physics will contain only dimensionless physical constants.[4] Lev Okun argues that while the laws of physics are based solely on dimensionless constants, measurements require units and the minimum set of dimensioned constants includes the speed of light, the Planck constant, and the gravitational constant.[5]

A set of fundamental dimensionless constants determine a given physical theory. Such constants cannot be explained by the theory and must be measured experimentally and verified to be constant in experiments. However such constants may be explained by a new theory with a different set of constants.[6]: 11  Developments in physics may lead to either a reduction or an extension of their number: discovery of new particles, or new relationships between physical phenomena, would introduce new constants, while the development of a more fundamental theory might allow the derivation of several constants from a more fundamental constant.

However, the term fundamental physical constant is also used to refer to certain universal dimensioned physical constants, such as the speed of light c, vacuum permittivity ε0, Planck constant h, and the Newtonian constant of gravitation G, that appear in the most basic theories of physics.[7][8][9] NIST[7] and CODATA[10] use the term in this manner.

Examples

Dimensionless fundamental physical constants include:

  • α, the fine-structure constant, (≈ ⁠1/137⁠). This is also the square of the electron charge, expressed in Planck units, which defines the scale of charge of elementary particles with charge. The electron charge is the coupling constant for the electromagnetic interaction.
  • μ or β, the proton-to-electron mass ratio (≈ 1836), the rest mass of the proton divided by that of the electron. More generally, the ratio of the rest masses of any pair of elementary particles.
  • αs, the coupling constant for the strong force (≈ 1)

Fine-structure constant

One of the dimensionless fundamental constants is the fine-structure constant:

0.0072973525643(11),

where e is the elementary charge, ħ is the reduced Planck constant, c is the speed of light in vacuum, and ε0 is the permittivity of free space. The fine-structure constant is fixed to the strength of the electromagnetic force. At low energies, α ≈ ⁠1/137⁠, whereas at the scale of the Z boson, about 90 GeV, one measures α ≈ ⁠1/127⁠. There is no accepted theory explaining the value of α.[11]

Standard Model

The original Standard Model of particle physics from the 1970s contained 19 fundamental dimensionless constants describing the masses of the particles and the strengths of the electroweak and strong forces. In the 1990s, neutrinos were discovered to have nonzero mass, and a quantity called the vacuum angle was found to be indistinguishable from zero.[12]: 293–296 

The complete Standard Model requires 25 fundamental dimensionless constants.[4] At present, their numerical values are not understood in terms of any widely accepted theory and are determined only from measurement. These 25 constants are:

Gravitational coupling constant

A gravitational coupling constant is a constant characterizing the gravitational attraction between a given pair of elementary particles. The electron mass is typically used, and the associated constant typically denoted αG. It is a dimensionless quantity, with the result that its numerical value does not vary with the choice of units of measurement, only with the choice of particle.

The gravitational coupling constant, αG, can be defined in terms of the gravitational attraction between two elementary particles:[13]

where:

For a proton the value of the dimensionless constant is approximately 5×10−39.[13][14]: 25 

In natural units where c = ħ = 1, the expression becomes[15]: 1153 

In 1961, a dimensionless gravitational coupling constant was used by Robert H. Dicke.[13] Dicke's work has been described as perhaps the first explicit discussion of the weak anthropic principle. This principle has various forms. The basic idea is that the constants in physical laws are limited to values which can give rise to physicists. Dicke reasoned that the gravitational coupling must be an extremely small number to ensure that expansion of the universe could continue against the force of gravity caused by all the matter in the universe.[16]: 7  Dicke's analysis countered an earlier hypothesis by Paul Dirac, suggesting that the gravitational coupling constant depends on cosmic density. In a Big Bang model of the universe, the density varies strongly with time. Dicke noted that sufficient time must elapse for stars to form and this requires a very small gravitational coupling constant.[15]: 1150 

Cosmological constants

The cosmological constant, which can be thought of as the density of dark energy in the universe, is a fundamental constant in physical cosmology that has a dimensionless value of approximately 10−122.[17] Other dimensionless constants are the measure of homogeneity in the universe, denoted by Q, which is explained below by Martin Rees, the baryon mass per photon, the cold dark matter mass per photon and the neutrino mass per photon.[18]

Barrow and Tipler

Barrow and Tipler (1986) anchor their broad-ranging discussion of astrophysics, cosmology, quantum physics, teleology, and the anthropic principle in the fine-structure constant, the proton-to-electron mass ratio (which they, along with Barrow (2002), call β), and the coupling constants for the strong force and gravitation.

Martin Rees's 'six numbers'

Martin Rees, in his book Just Six Numbers,[19] mulls over the following six dimensionless constants, whose values he deems fundamental to present-day physical theory and the known structure of the universe:

Any plausible fundamental physical theory must be consistent with these six constants, and must either derive their values from the mathematics of the theory, or accept their values as empirical.

History

In the 1920s and 1930s, Arthur Eddington embarked upon extensive mathematical investigation into the relations between the fundamental quantities in basic physical theories, later used as part of his effort to construct an overarching theory unifying quantum mechanics and cosmological physics. For example, he speculated on the potential consequences of the ratio of the electron radius to its mass. Most notably, in a 1929 paper he set out an argument based on the Pauli exclusion principle and the Dirac equation that fixed the value of the reciprocal of the fine-structure constant as 𝛼−1 = 16 + ⁠1/2⁠ × 16 × (16–1) = 136. When its value was discovered to be closer to 137, he changed his argument to match that value. His ideas were not widely accepted, and subsequent experiments have shown that they were wrong (for example, none of the measurements of the fine-structure constant suggest an integer value; the modern CODATA value is α−1 = 137.035999177(21).[21]

Eddington may have been the first to attempt in vain to derive the basic dimensionless constants from fundamental theories and equations, but he was certainly not the last. Many others would subsequently undertake similar endeavors, and efforts occasionally continue even today. None have yet produced convincing results or gained wide acceptance among theoretical physicists.[22][23]

An empirical relation between the masses of the electron, muon and tau has been discovered by physicist Yoshio Koide, but this formula remains unexplained.[24]

See also

References

  1. ↑ Stroke, H. H., ed., The Physical Review: The First Hundred Years (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 1995), p. 525.
  2. ↑ Kunes, Josef (13 February 2012). Dimensionless Physical Quantities in Science and Engineering. Elsevier Science. ISBN 978-0-12-391458-3.
  3. ↑ Michael Duff (2014). "How fundamental are fundamental constants?". Contemporary Physics. 56 (1): 35–47. arXiv:1412.2040. Bibcode:2015ConPh..56...35D. doi:10.1080/00107514.2014.980093. S2CID 118347723.
  4. 1 2 Baez, John (22 April 2011). "How Many Fundamental Constants Are There?". math.ucr.edu. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
  5. ↑ Duff, M. J.; Okun, L. B.; Veneziano, G. (2002). "Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2002 (3): 023. arXiv:physics/0110060. Bibcode:2002JHEP...03..023D. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/03/023. S2CID 15806354.
  6. ↑ Uzan, Jean-Philippe (4 September 2025). "Fundamental constants: from measurement to the universe, a window on gravitation and cosmology". Living Reviews in Relativity. 28 (1): 6. arXiv:2410.07281. doi:10.1007/s41114-025-00059-y. ISSN 1433-8351.
  7. 1 2 "Introduction to the Fundamental Physical Constants". physics.nist.gov. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
  8. ↑ "Physical constant". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
  9. ↑ Karshenboim, Savely G. (August 2005). "Fundamental Physical Constants: Looking from Different Angles". Canadian Journal of Physics. 83 (8): 767–811. arXiv:physics/0506173. Bibcode:2005CaJPh..83..767K. doi:10.1139/p05-047. ISSN 0008-4204. S2CID 475086.
  10. ↑ Mohr, Peter J.; Newell, David B.; Taylor, Barry N. (26 September 2016). "CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2014". Reviews of Modern Physics. 88 (3) 035009. arXiv:1507.07956. Bibcode:2016RvMP...88c5009M. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035009. ISSN 0034-6861. S2CID 1115862.
  11. ↑ Richard P. Feynman (1985). QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter. Princeton University Press. p. 129. ISBN 978-0-691-08388-9.
  12. ↑ Quint, W., & M. Vogel, Fundamental Physics in Particle Traps (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2014), pp. 293–296.
  13. 1 2 3 Dicke, R. H. (November 1961). "Dirac's Cosmology and Mach's Principle". Nature. 192 (4801): 440–441. doi:10.1038/192440a0. ISSN 0028-0836.
  14. ↑ Rohlf, James William; Rohlf, James (1994). Modern Physics from Alpha to Z (International ed.). New York, NY: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-02126-1.
  15. 1 2 Hogan, Craig J. (1 October 2000). "Why the universe is just so". Reviews of Modern Physics. 72 (4): 1149–1161. arXiv:astro-ph/9909295. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.72.1149. ISSN 0034-6861.
  16. ↑ Weinberg, Steven (1 January 1989). "The cosmological constant problem". Reviews of Modern Physics. 61 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1. hdl:2152/61094. ISSN 0034-6861.
  17. ↑ Jaffe, R. L., & Taylor, W., The Physics of Energy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), p. 419.
  18. ↑ Tegmark, Max (2014). Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 252. ISBN 978-0-307-59980-3.
  19. ↑ Radford, T., "Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe by Martin Rees—review", The Guardian, 8 June 2012.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 Rees, Martin J. (1999). Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 978-0-297-84297-2.
  21. ↑ "2022 CODATA Value: inverse fine-structure constant". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty. NIST. May 2024. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  22. ↑ Kragh, Helge (14 October 2015). "On Arthur Eddington's Theory of Everything". arXiv:1510.04046 [physics.hist-ph].
  23. ↑ Gamow, G. (1 February 1968). "Numerology of the Constants of Nature". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 59 (2): 313–318. Bibcode:1968PNAS...59..313G. doi:10.1073/pnas.59.2.313. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 224670. PMID 16591598.
  24. ↑ Rivero, A.; Gsponer, A. (2 February 2008). "The strange formula of Dr. Koide". p. 4. arXiv:hep-ph/0505220.

External articles

General
Articles on variance of the fundamental constants