Cost Accounting Standards
Cost Accounting Standards (popularly known as CAS) are a set of 19 standards and rules promulgated by the United States Government for use in determining costs on negotiated procurements. CAS differs from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) in that FAR applies to substantially all contractors, whereas CAS applies primarily to the larger ones.
History
In 1970, Congress established the original Cost Accounting Standards Board (CASB) to promulgate cost accounting standards designed to achieve uniformity and consistency in the cost accounting principles followed by defense contractors and subcontractors in excess of $100,000, and to establish regulations to require defense contractors and subcontractors, as a condition of contracting, to disclose in writing their cost accounting practices, to follow the disclosed practices consistently and to comply with promulgated cost accounting standards.
After adopting 19 standards, the original CASB was dissolved on September 30, 1980; the standards, however, remained active and the CASB was revived in 1988 within the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). The current CASB consists of five members: the OFPP Administrator (who serves as Chairman) and one member from the United States Department of Defense (this position is held by the Director of the Defense Contract Audit Agency), the General Services Administration, industry, and the private sector.[1]
The Standards
The original CASB adopted 19 standards, numbered 401 through 420 (419 was never assigned). The new CASB readopted the original 19 standards with only minor modifications, and has yet to adopt any new standards.
| Standard | Title |
|---|---|
| 401 | Consistency in Estimating, Accumulating and Reporting Cost |
| 402 | Consistency in Allocating Costs Incurred for the Same Purpose |
| 403 | Allocation of Home Office Expenses to Segments |
| 404(*) | Capitalization of Tangible Assets |
| 405 | Accounting for Unallowable Costs |
| 406 | Cost Accounting Period |
| 407 | Use of Standard Costs for Direct Material and Direct Labor |
| 408(*) | Accounting for Costs of Compensated Personal Absence |
| 409(*) | Depreciation of Tangible Capital Assets |
| 410 | Allocation of Business Unit General and Administrative Expenses to Final Cost Objectives |
| 411(*) | Accounting for Acquisition Costs of Material |
| 412 | Composition and Measurement of Pension Costs |
| 413 | Adjustment and Allocation of Pension Cost |
| 414 | Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost of Facilities Capital |
| 415 | Accounting for the Cost of Deferred Compensation |
| 416 | Accounting for Insurance Cost |
| 417 | Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost of Capital Assets Under Construction |
| 418 | Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs |
| 419 | unused |
| 420 | Accounting for Independent Research and Development Costs and Bid and Proposal Costs (IR&D and B&P) |
- (*) rescinded by Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Final Rule on August 7, 2026.
- (^) OFPP issued a Preliminary Rule which intends to rescind this standard; a Final Rule has not yet been issued.
2026 Changes
Though not required by the 2026 NDAA, as a result of the legislation (and Executive Orders calling for increased competition in the defense industry), the Office of Federal Procurement Policy issued a Final Rule, effective August 7, 2026, which rescinded four of the standards, as follows:[2]
- CAS 404 was rescinded except for one provision related to making gains or losses, as a result of a merger or acquisition, unallowable; that provision was moved to a new section under CAS 405.
- CAS 408 was rescinded in its entirety; in those instances where the change would have otherwise required a "cost impact statement" (required in some instances when a contractor either must, or has chosen to, make an accounting change), the Final Rule waived the requirement.
- CAS 409 was rescinded except for three provisions related to 1) requiring gains and losses to be measured consistent with depreciation, 2) prohibiting gains and losses to be claimed on assets transferred in other than arms-length transactions that are subsequently disposed within one year, and 3) allowing the parties to negotiate a shorter service life than would otherwise be allowed in special circumstances; those provisions were moved to new sections under CAS 405.
- CAS 411 was rescinded in its entirety.
Another proposed rule which would rescind CAS 407 (with some provisions moved to CAS 418) was issued as a Preliminary Rule in March 2026; the Final Rule has not yet been issued.
CAS Applicability
CAS applies to contracts, not contractors, through Federal Acquisition Regulation clauses. A company may have contracts that are subject to "full" CAS coverage (be required to follow all 19 standards), "modified" CAS coverage (required to follow only Standards 401, 402, 405, and 406), simultaneously have contracts that are subject to either modified or full coverage, or be exempt from coverage. However, a company under "full" coverage is not subject to a standard where it does not apply (e.g., a company which does not use standard costing does not have to comply with CAS 407).
Under Section 1806 of the 2026 NDAA, CAS coverage is as follows:
- "Full" coverage applies when a company receives a single negotiated contract (not otherwise exempt) of US$100 million or more in the current accounting period, or, in the preceding cost accounting period, multiple CAS-covered contracts cumulatively totaling US$100 million. In addition to complying with all 19 standards (where applicable), the company must also file a CAS Disclosure Statement, which spells out the company's accounting practices (such as if certain costs are treated as direct contract charges or as part of overhead expense). There are two versions of the CAS Disclosure Statement: DS-1 applies to commercial companies while DS-2 applies to educational institutions.[3]
- "Modified" coverage applies to contracts when a company receives a single negotiated contract (not otherwise exempt) of US$35 million or more (prior rules calling for a "trigger" contract were rescinded).
In some instances, a contract may be exempt from CAS standards:
- Contracts awarded to small businesses are exempt from CAS, regardless of contract size.
- Any contract less than the threshold for certified cost or pricing data under the Truth in Negotiations Act (as of October 1, 2025, the threshold is US$2.5 million) is always exempt.
- Any contract less than US$7.5 million is exempt, provided the company has not been awarded a contract greater than US$7.5 million in the past.
- Contracts for commercial items
- Contracts awarded under sealed bid procedures, or where "adequate price competition" was available (the latter meaning where at least two companies had the ability to bid and perform on a contract, even if only one bid was later received)
- Contracts where the price is set by law or regulation
- Contracts awarded to foreign governments
- Contracts awarded to foreign concerns (only the disclosure statement and CAS 401 and 402 apply in this case) (See CFR 9903.201-1(b))
Previously, contracts where performance would have been performed entirely outside the United States (including territories and possessions) were also exempt, but this exemption was removed for new contracts effective October 11, 2011.
Furthermore, in some instances even where a company is subject to a standard, different rules may apply within the standard itself as to what a company is required to do. As an example, under CAS 403, if Company A's "residual expenses" (defined as those expenses incurred by the home office – usually the corporate office – which cannot be identified to a specific contract, group of contracts, or company segment) exceed a specified percentage of revenue, Company A must follow a dictated "three-factor" formula to allocate such expenses, but if Company B's residual expenses do not exceed the percentage (even if, in dollar terms, they are greater), Company B may follow the formula but is not required to do so.
Related links
References
- ↑ Rayburn, Frank R. "Cost Accounting Standards Board (1970-1980-; 1988-) in History of Accounting: An International Encyclopedia, edited by Michael Chatfield and Richard Vangermeersch. New York: Galrnad Publishing, 1996. Pp. 178-180.
- ↑ https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/cost-accounting-standards-board-casb-makes-progress-on-conforming-cas-to-gaap
- ↑ CASB - DS2 for Educational Institutions, revised October 1994, accessed 25 December 2019