2012 Hsinchu karaoke bar fire

2012 Hsinchu karaoke bar fire
LocationEast District, Hsinchu City
DateMarch 12, 2012
Attack type
Arson
Deaths5
Injured4
PerpetratorPeng Jianyuan

On March 12, 2012, in East District, Hsinchu City, Taiwan, 34-year-old Peng Jianyuan set a fire in a karaoke bar, resulting in five deaths and four injuries.[1] Peng was dissatisfied that his close friend Zhou Zhiqiang (also aged 34 at the time) refused to stand up for him. Peng therefore purchased NT$300 worth of gasoline and set fire to Zhou's KTV, located on Minghu Road, Hsinchu City.[2]

On September 2, 2014, the Supreme Court of the Republic of China (Taiwan) sentenced Peng Jianyuan to death, with the verdict finalized. Peng is currently detained at the Tucheng Detention Center in New Taipei City, awaiting execution by firing squad.[2]

In 2024, the Constitutional Court accepted a petition for constitutional interpretation regarding the death penalty submitted by Peng Jianyuan and 37 other death row inmates.[3]

Peng Jianyuan

Peng Jianyuan was excessively indulged from a young age. After completing military service, he associated with heavy drug users. Over trivial disputes—such as being unable to obtain money to buy drugs, or being honked at while driving—he would become violently enraged and commit crimes.[4]

Regardless of whether the target was his parents, former acquaintances, or complete strangers, Peng consistently resorted to violent means. He had previously planned to attack his father with a knife, and had a criminal record including drug offenses, unlawful detention, and domestic violence.[4][5][6]

Course of the crime

In the early morning of March 12, 2012, in Hsinchu City, Peng Jianyuan became dissatisfied that his close friend Zhou Zhiqiang refused to assist him. Accompanied by a woman surnamed Wang, Peng drove to a gas station and purchased 10 liters of gasoline, then went to Zhou's KTV on Minghu Road. When Zhou opened the door, Peng splashed gasoline and ignited the fire, using the metal container holding the gasoline to block the small entrance, preventing escape. Three people inside were able to escape through a safety exit.[4]

After the arson, Peng behaved suspiciously and was intercepted by a police patrol network. He was subsequently escorted to a hospital under guard. Following investigation, police identified Peng Jianyuan as a suspect. After questioning, he was transferred to the Hsinchu District Prosecutors Office on charges of murder and public endangerment, and his detention was approved by the court.[4]

Casualties

The five deceased victims were Tian Dezhen (33, male), Qiu Wenfu (32, male), Xu Zongyong (42, male), Lin Meijing (46, female), and Yan Guifen (42, female).[5] Qiu Wenfu was the owner of the well-known Hsinchu Chenghuang Temple eatery Afu Braised Pork Rice.[7][8]

The four injured individuals were Zhou Zhiqiang (34, male), the property owner, who suffered burns to all limbs; Zhou Yurong (26, female, seven months pregnant), who suffered smoke inhalation; Xu Yuzhen (37, female), who also suffered smoke inhalation; and Peng Jianyuan (34, male), the arson suspect, who sustained burns to both hands.[1]

Indictment and trial

On June 6, 2012, after being taken into custody, Peng showed concern only for whether he met the criteria for voluntary surrender and displayed no remorse whatsoever for his crimes. Prosecutors at the Hsinchu District Prosecutors Office considered Peng's actions to be extremely malicious and believed that he needed to be permanently isolated from society, and therefore specifically sought the death penalty.[5]

On November 28, the Hsinchu District Court ruled that Peng was not eligible for sentence reduction based on voluntary surrender, and in the first-instance judgment, sentenced him to death for intentional homicide and homicide with indeterminate intent, and deprived him of civil rights for life.[6][9]

On December 12, Peng's friend Zhou Zhiqiang was indicted for negligent homicide in the course of business and violations of the Building Act, due to operating the karaoke business illegally in a tin structure and failing to provide adequate safety equipment, resulting in the deaths of five people.[10]

On May 9, 2013, the Taiwan High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the death sentence in the second-instance trial.[9]

On December 12, the Supreme Court found the evidence insufficient and remanded the case to the High Court for retrial.[11]

On March 11, 2014, the High Court, in the first retrial, again upheld the death sentence, with the judges concluding that Peng's crimes were extremely serious and that he was beyond rehabilitation.[12]

On September 2, the Supreme Court, in the third-instance trial, finalized the death sentence for Peng Jianyuan. He is currently detained at the Taipei Detention Center, awaiting execution by firing squad.[2]

Divergent views

Peng Jianyuan had a medical history of mental illness, and throughout all stages of trial, the charge applied was “homicide with indeterminate intent.”

According to interpretations of the International Covenants on Human Rights (the “Two Covenants”) by the Supreme Court in cases such as the Chen Kunming murder case and the Lin Jixiong arson case that killed 13 people, individuals with mental disorders should not be sentenced to death, and non-premeditated homicide should not carry the death penalty.[13]

In response, Lin Xinyi, executive director of the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty, stated that the Supreme Court has issued inconsistent opinions on whether defendants with mental disorders may be sentenced to death. The Supreme Court responded by clarifying that it had already provided clear legal interpretations, and that the reasoning and main holdings of its judgments were explicitly stated and appropriate.[14]

Lai Zhongxing, presiding judge of the Fourth Criminal Division of the Supreme Court, along with four other judges, held that the prohibition against sentencing or executing individuals with mental or intellectual disabilities to death was intended merely to “urge” compliance, rather than constituting a mandatory requirement under the Two Covenants, and therefore did not possess the force of domestic law.[13][15]

Gao Rongzhi, executive director of the Judicial Reform Foundation, argued that the Supreme Court, in order to cater to public sentiment favoring the death penalty, convened a life-and-death debate and subsequently hollowed out the Two Covenants, producing a rationalized legal interpretation to justify sentencing Peng Jianyuan to death.[14]

In 2024, the Constitutional Court accepted the petition for constitutional interpretation regarding the death penalty submitted by Peng Jianyuan and 37 other death row inmates.[3]

References

  1. 1 2 "恨友不相挺 縱火殺5人" [Hatred of his friends' lack of support, he set fire to a house and killed five people.]. 蘋果日報 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  2. 1 2 3 "KTV縱火致5人死 彭建源判死定讞" [Arson at KTV kills five; Peng Chien-yuan sentenced to death.]. 公視新聞網 PNN (in Traditional Chinese). 2014-09-03. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  3. 1 2 "死刑合憲或違憲爭點一次看 憲法法庭23日開庭辯論" [A look at the constitutional or unconstitutional debate surrounding the death penalty: The Constitutional Court held a hearing on the 23rd.]. 中央社 CNA (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2024-04-27. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  4. 1 2 3 4 "放火後 狂男飆車去" [After setting the fire, the man sped off in his car.]. 蘋果日報 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Archived from the original on 2017-06-28. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  5. 1 2 3 "縱火燒死5人 求處死刑" [Arsonist who killed five people seeks death penalty.]. 自由電子報 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-05-20. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  6. 1 2 "縱火害5命 惡男判死刑" [Arsonist who killed five people sentenced to death.]. 自由電子報 (in Chinese). 2012-11-30. Archived from the original on 2019-12-12. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  7. ↑ "名店老闆遇死劫 4子失依" [A famous shop owner dies in a fatal accident, leaving his four children orphaned.]. 蘋果日報 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Archived from the original on 2017-06-28. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  8. ↑ 中天電視 (2012-03-13). 【中天】3/13新竹知名滷肉飯老闆被燒死　前妻帶4子喊冤. Retrieved 2025-12-23 – via YouTube.On March 13, the owner of a well-known braised pork rice restaurant in Hsinchu was burned to death; his ex-wife and four children protested his innocence.
  9. 1 2 "縱火燒卡拉OK釀5死　男判死刑" [Arson at Karaoke Bar Kills 5; Man Sentenced to Death]. 蘋果日報 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Archived from the original on 2017-01-14. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  10. ↑ "違法卡拉OK害5人燒死 遭訴" [Five people burned to death at an illegal karaoke bar; indictment filed.]. 蘋果日報 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Archived from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  11. ↑ "縱火害5命 死囚求死 仍發回更審" [Arsonist who killed five people on death row pleaded for his life, but the case was sent back for further review.]. 自由電子報 (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2019-05-23. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  12. ↑ "新竹KTV縱火害5命　凶嫌彭建源更一審仍判死刑" [Arson at a Hsinchu KTV that killed five people: Suspect Peng Chien-yuan was sentenced to death in a retrial.]. ETtoday新聞雲 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Archived from the original on 2019-05-24. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  13. 1 2 黃錦嵐. "司法論衡：彭建源死刑定讞案的〈兩公約〉爭議" [Judicial Commentary: The Controversy Over the Two Conventions in the Peng Chien-yuan Death Sentencing Case]. on.cc東網 (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Archived from the original on 2019-05-24. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  14. 1 2 "廢死聯盟轟見解不一 網友批只判死不執行" [The Abolitionist Coalition criticizes differing opinions, with netizens arguing that only death sentences are handed down without execution.]. 中時電子報 (in Chinese (Taiwan)). Archived from the original on 2017-01-14. Retrieved 2025-12-23.
  15. ↑ "社團法人高雄市築夢關懷協會" [Kaohsiung City Dream Building and Care Association]. www.ksdreamba.artcom.tw. Archived from the original on 2019-05-19. Retrieved 2025-12-23.

This page is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.